Legal Opinion

White v. Conover

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1840PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ERROR to the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

This was an action of trespass quare clausum, fregit. The declaration contains two counts. The first count alleges a continuing trespass in one close describing it by abuttals, and the second, a similar trespass in another close generally; both counts charge the felling of timber, &c.

The defendant pleaded, 1. The general issue; 2¿ Professing to answer the whole declaration, he alleged the existence of a highway “ over and along the said close in which,” &c., and because the trees “ in the declaration mentioned obstructed the highway in the said close,” he felled and removed them, doing as…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doctor v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Strong v. MakeeverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Brown v. GobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Erwin v. FulkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API