Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Gilbert.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1946No. 4-8023PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddiN, Justice.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed because of appellants’ noncompliance with Rule 9 of this court, which rule provides, in part: “In all civil cases the appellant shall . . . file abstract . . . The abstract or abridgment of the transcript shall set forth the material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts and documents . . ., together with other matters from the record as are necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to this Court for decision. . .

This is a law case; and the appellants argue that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Thomson v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Wallace v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Love v. CowgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Van Hoozer v. HendricksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Surridge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Perdue v. RoyseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API