Legal Opinion

Welk v. Sorenson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1919No. L. A. No. 4721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an order refusing to credit the sum of $15 costs (for which judgment had been entered in favor of Grace A. Sorenson) upon a judgment against her codefendant in the same action, Albert Sorenson, the appellant basing the argument against the order largely upon the case ofAdams v. Baker, 24 Nev. 375, [55 P. 362].

The appeal is by the alternative method, but appellant neither prints any of the record in the brief nor designates in any way the parts of the transcript upon which the alleged "statement of facts" is based. We will not, therefore, consider the brief. (Code Civ.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Adams v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  3. In Re Estate of KeithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Whiting-Mead Com. Co. v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Arthur v. FettermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. City Street Improvement Co. v. SilvershieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API