Legal Opinion

City Street Improvement Co. v. Silvershield

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1919No. Civ. No. 2749Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The appeal, upon the alternative procedure, is from a judgment upon a private contract for street work in the city of Santa Rosa. In the opening brief there is no appendix, and the only pretense of setting out any part of the record, if indeed it is a part of the record, is a mutilated excerpt from a part of the private contract. There is a statement that one of the principal points upon which the appellants rely is the construction of the contract. The respondent’s brief consists of a single paragraph asking that the judgment be affirmed for the reason that the appellants have not printed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Estate of KeithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Welk v. SorensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Whiting-Mead Com. Co. v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API