Quigley v. Rosenthal
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.
This is a defamation and wiretap case. Plaintiffs William and Dorothy Quigley allege that Defendants the Anti-Defamation League (“ADL”) and Saul F. Rosenthal, in his individual and representative capacity, conducted a campaign of defamation against them in order to falsely portray the Quigleys as anti-Semites. The Quig-leys raise twenty-nine claims against defendants, alleging that defendants caused Mitchell and Candice Aronson 1 to intercept the Quigley family’s private telephone conversations and then used those recorded…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hibdon v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Bustos v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Tapley v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
- Hannah v. Roadway Express, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Mink v. KnoxDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.