State v. . Tyndall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.,
after stating the case: While there may be some slight contrariety of expression in the decisions as to whether a forcible trespass may be committed where the entry is peaceable (S. v. Laney, 87 N. C., 535), nevertheless it seems to be settled by the later cases that, although an entry on lands may be effected peaceably and even with the permission of the owner, yet if, after going upon the premises of another, the defendant uses violent and abusive language and commits acts such as are reasonably calculated to intimidate or lead to a breach of the peace, he would be guilty of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Jarrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . SkeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. . LaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. . HoffmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- City of Charleston v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Anthony v. Teachers Protective UnionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.