Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Armstrong-Lofton
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 15, 1998No. CV 97-7270 CAS (Ex)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SNYDER, District Judge.
On review of the motion, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7.11. The hearing date of June 15, 1998, is hereby vacated. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, the arguments of counsel, and the case file, the Court hereby grants plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. Introduction
This action arises out of multiple claims for life insurance benefits under a Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (“FEG-LI”) policy issued by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Abromson v. American Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HollandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Hillman v. MarettaFairfax County Circuit Court · 2010
- Maretta v. HillmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012