Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenney

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 11, 1958No. Cr. 563-58PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, District Judge.

The defendant by a motion to suppress challenges the legality of the search of the premises occupied by him at 2124-8th St., N. W. in the District of Columbia. The motion arises from the following circumstances:

The police, after receiving information from an informer as to the whereabouts and business of the defendant, secured a search warrant for premises known as 2144-8th St., N. W., Washington, D. C. The police then proceeded to 2144-8th St., N. W., Washington, D. C. Upon their arrival, they asked for “Pot”. They had been admitted by a person who was deaf and dumb.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Savannah Hinton, United States of America v. Susie Powers, Alias Susie PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. WroblewskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. One 1949 Buick SedanetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
  4. United States v. SandsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
  2. United States v. Christopher GitchoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. State v. BrochuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. United States v. PisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Shedd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API