Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Driscoll

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 17, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The present bar discipline matter is before us on a reservation and report, without decision, from a single justice of this court. The Board of Bar Overseers (board) has recommended that the respondent, Wilfred C. Driscoll, Jr., be suspended from the practice of law for two years as a consequence of pleading guilty in the Federal District Court to one count of making a false statement to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (2000). For the reasons *679that follow, we conclude that a one-year suspension from the practice of law is the appropriate disciplinary sanction.

1.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. In the Matter of the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. In re ConcemiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. In re FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLPMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. In re CurryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. In re MurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. In re FinneranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. In re BalliroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API