Legal Opinion

BellSouth Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1996No. Nos. 94-4113, 95-3315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Chief Judge.

BellSouth has moved to recall our mandate issued as a result of our November 9, 1995 opinion, Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 69 F.3d 752 (6th Cir.1995). The company further moves to vacate the cellular structural separation rule promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission at 47 C.F.R. § 22.903. Although BellSouth also requests oral argu*851ment on this motion, the Court unanimously agrees that the Court’s disposition of this motion would not be aided by oral argument and accordingly denies that request. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Dilley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Norman Gradsky, George Levine, B. J. Gradsky, Robert B. Roberts, Alfred Schiff, Robert Grene, Leonard L. Glaser and E. E. Gibbons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Eva Hines v. Royal Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  5. Meredith v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bellsouth Corporation v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API