Legal Opinion
Minton v. Quintal.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 2013No. SCWC-11-0000317PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
POLLACK, J.
This appeal arises from the actions of Respondents/Defendants-Appellees Sidney A. Quintal, John C. Fuhrmann, and the City and County of Honolulu (City) (collectively, “Respondents”) to ban two stagehands, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants Eric J. Minton and Richard M. Stanley (collectively, “Petitioners”), from working at certain City-owned facilities based on their involvement in a charitable concert featuring the City’s mayor. Petitioners challenged the ban as an abuse of Respondents’ authority, a violation of due process, and as tortious interference with…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barker v. GottliebDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- Johnson v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Shimose v. Hawai'i Health Systems Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- Minton v. QuintalHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
- Nakanelua v. United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIODistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.