Legal Opinion

Dale v. Modern Woodmen of America

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Writ oe Error to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Gallatin county; the Hon. Jacob R. Creighton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

This writ of error is prosecuted to reverse a judgment of the Appellate Court for the Fourth District affirming a judgment for $1000, recovered against the plaintiff in error in an action of assumpsit in the circuit court of Gallatin county.

Section 121 of the Practice act (Laws of 1907, p. 468,) provides that in all cases where the sum or value in the controversy shall exceed $1000, exclusive of costs, any party to such cause shall be permitted to remove the same to the Supreme Court by appeal or writ of error. We have held' that under this section neither an appeal nor a writ of error would…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atton v. South Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Land Board v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API