Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 23, 1912No. 4246PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari; from Decatur superior court — Judge Frank Park. May 12, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

The plaintiff’s right to recover resting solely upon the statutory presumption of negligence, and the undisputed testimony of the engineer and fireman showing that they were in the exercise of all ordinary care and diligence, and that the killing of the plaintiff’s cow was not due to any negligence on the part of the defendant or its employees, the presumption of negligence was fully rebutted, and the recovery in favor of the plaintiff was unauthorized. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Hamilton, 9 Ga. App. 254 (70 S. E. 1126); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Whitaker, 10 Ga. App. 207 (73 S.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Whiddon v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Georgia Railroad v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API