Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
“The plaintiff’s right to recover resting solely upon the statutory presumption of negligence, and the undisputed testimony of the engineer and fireman showing that they were in the exercise of all ordinary care and diligence, and that the killing of the plaintiff’s cow was not due to any negligence on the part of the defendant or its employees, the presumption of negligence was fully rebutted, and the recovery in favor of the plaintiff was unauthorized. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Hamilton, 9 Ga. App. 254 (70 S. E. 1126); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Whitaker, 10 Ga. App. 207 (73 S.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whiddon v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Stanford v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927