Legal Opinion

Pamela Manic v. Tucson City Attorney's Office

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 16, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0128Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2006 STATE OF ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO DIVISION TWO PAMELA MANIC, ) ) 2 CA-CV 2005-0128 Petitioner/Appellee, ) DEPARTMENT B ) v. ) OPINION ) HONORABLE KATE DAWES, Judge of ) the Tucson City Court of the State of ) Arizona in and for the County of Pima, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) ) TUCSON CITY ATTORNEY’S ) OFFICE, ) ) Real Party in Interest/Appellant. ) ) APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY Cause No. C-20051824 Honorable Frank Dawley, Judge Pro Tempore AFFIRMED David Alan Darby and Natasha Wrae Tucson Attorneys for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API