Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Raczkowski

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 8, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On October 22, 1984, Arthur Raczkowski was called to testify before a Plymouth County grand jury which was conducting an investigation into the theft of cocaine from the Brockton police station earlier that year. After identifying himself and answering other preliminary questions, Raczkowski refused to answer further questions, asserting the privilege against self-incrimination afforded by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by art. 12 of the Declaration of Rights of the Massachusetts Constitution. The Plymouth district attorney then applied for witness im*992munity for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. CorsettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Labor Relations Commission v. Fall River Educators Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SteinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. In re District AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. SingletonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014
  4. In Re: Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Superior Court · 2020
  5. In re JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API