Legal Opinion

Cedric Thompson v. Martin et al.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 26, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01021Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION CEDRIC THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:25cv1021 DRL-SJF MARTIN et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Cedric Thompson, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed an amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF 7.) The court must screen this pleading and dismiss it if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. To proceed beyond the pleading stage, a complaint must contain sufficient…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API