Legal Opinion

Downey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

Eugene Downey (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a referee denying him specific loss benefits under Section 306(c)(8) of The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 We affirm.

Claimant began working for St. Joe Resources (St. Joe) on May 8, 1950. On September 17, 1987, Zinc Corporation of America (Zinc Corporation) purchased St. Joe’s assets, and the operations previously conducted by St. Joe in Monaca, Pennsylvania, continued under the ownership of Zinc Corporation. Claimant continued to work…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Wells-Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Sun Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API