Legal Opinion
Sun Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 4, 1991No. 288 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY, Senior Judge.
Sun Oil Company (Sunoco), petitioner, appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision that granted benefits to Andrew J. Davis, III, the claimant. Davis filed a petition alleging complete loss of hearing for all practical intents and purposes. The referee found the following facts. During the course of his employment with Sunoco, Davis was exposed to harmful noise levels at an industrial plant. As a result of that exposure, Davis suffered a complete loss of hearing in both ears for all practical intents and purposes. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Monaci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Cyclops Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Walzer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Cannon Boiler Works, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joseph KRYSZTOFORSKI, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Sellari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hermanson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.