Legal Opinion

Lehman v. City of Brooklyn

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1859PublishedCited by 18 opinions

ÁPPEAL from a judgment of the city court The facts are detailed in the opinion of the of Brooklyn, court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Brown, J.

This action was most indifferently and inefficiently tried, for the examinations failed to bring out the facts upon which its determination must ultimately depend.

The plaintiff is the administrator of George Lehman, deceased, and the action is for negligence, whereby the plaintiff’s intestate was deprived of his life, on the 5th May, 1856. It appeared by the proof, that at the time of the alleged death there was a well within the line and upon the sidewalk of Division avenue, in the city of Brooklyn. The mouth of the well being level with the grade of the sidewalk,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartfield v. RoperNew York Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Allen v. WillardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. FaberTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Sparrow's Admr.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. FryerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API