Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Inc21.com Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 2012No. 11-15330UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Defendants Inc21.com Corporation, Jumpage Solutions, Inc., GST U.S.A., Inc., Roy Yu Lin and John Yu Lin appeal the judgment of the district court in this civil enforcement action by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) arising from the defendants’ practice of charging consumers through local phone bills for online services they never agreed to purchase. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court concluded that the defendants engaged in deceptive and unfair billing practices in violation of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act), 15 U.S.C. § 45, and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Federal Trade Commission v. StefanchikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIGGIE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Commerce Planet, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Omics Grp. Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Federal Trade Commission v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Bradley MiklovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. The Mortgage Law Group, LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.