Legal Opinion

Richard C. Hickson v. Vescom Corporation

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 25, 2014No. Docket Was-13-214PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] Vescom Corporation, which provided private security services at a paper mill owned by Domtar, 1 appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Washington County, R. Murray, J.) entered in favor of Richard C. Hickson after a jury found that Vescom had violated the Whis-tleblowers’ Protection Act, 26 M.R.S. §§ 831-840 (2013), by terminating Hick-son’s employment as a security officer stationed at the mill. Vescom argues that Hickson failed to make a protected whis-tleblower’s report because he reported only the actions of Domtar or government officials and not the actions of his employer,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Currie v. Industrial Security, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Costain v. Sunbury Primary Care, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Budzko v. One City Center Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Central Maine Power Company v. Devereux Marine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roy v. Correct Care Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. Victor Sunshine v. Stephen M. BrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. Wendell Strout Jr. v. Central Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Selcuk Karamanoglu v. Catherine (Karamanoglu) GourlaouenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Michael A. Doyle v. Town of FalmouthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API