Legal Opinion

Selcuk Karamanoglu v. Catherine (Karamanoglu) Gourlaouen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 7, 2016No. Docket Cum-15-459PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHjelm, J.

[¶ 1] Catherine Gourlaouen appeals, and Selcuk Karamanoglu cross-appeals, from a divorce judgment entered in the District Court (Portland, Eggert, J.) after it accepted and adopted the reports of a referee. Gourlaouen challenges aspects of the judgment relating to parental rights and responsibilities, and to the détermination of the parties’ interests in properties located in Yarmouth and France. In his cross-appeal, Karamanoglu alleges that he was not given proper credit for contributions he made toward the purchase of the France property. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. James A. Ehret v. Deborah B. EhretSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Searles v. Fleetwood Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Richard C. Hickson v. Vescom CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Mathew H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Mills v. FlemingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Estate of GilbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Estate of LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. Amy B. Mills v. Roger M. FlemingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API