Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Bureau of Pardons and Paroles

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1981No. Docket 44015PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This original mandamus action concerns the impact of the rule set forth in two consolidated cases: People ex rel Oakland County Prosecuting Attorney v Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and Trudeau v Oakland Circuit Judge, 78 Mich App 111; 259 NW2d 385 (1977), generally known as the Trudeau decision. The essential issue before this Court is the reach of Trudeau.

Plaintiff James David Lamb pled guilty to a supplemental information charging him as a third-felony offender, MCL 769.11 et seq.; MSA 28.1083 et seq., in Detroit Recorder’s Court. A sentence of five to ten years imprisonment was imposed. At…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People Ex Rel. Oakland Prosecuting Attorney v. Bureau of Pardons & ParolesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. HaggittMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chester Wheeler Campbell v. L. Brooks Patterson, (No. 81-1116) Frank J. Kelley, (No. 81-1421)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Timmons v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  3. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Campbell v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API