Legal Opinion

Albert Brick and Samuel Intrater v. Charles S. Hirsch, Albert Brick and Samuel Intrater v. Arthur Gettleman and Frank E. Gettleman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 7, 1964No. 14302-14303_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellees, Albert Brick, a Washington, D. C., attorney, and his partner, Samuel Intrater, 1 brought suit in the District Court against defendants-appellants, Charles S. Hirsch, Arthur Gettleman and Frank E. Gettleman to recover on an alleged contract under which Brick was to be paid one-third of any fee received by the defendants in connection with certain United States Tax Court litigation. 2

The defendants by their answers denied any agreement was ever made with plaintiffs relative to fees in the tax cases involved and averred that such services as Brick…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Perry George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  3. Carl Whitson D/B/A Allen Mfg. Company v. Aurora Iron & Metal Co., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. Perry George v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  5. William H. Loehde and Jessie Carolyn Loehde v. Wisconsin River Power Company, a Wisconsin Corporation, and Walter BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hofreiter v. LeighAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Fitzgerald v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  3. Collier v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  4. Phillips v. JoyceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Collier v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API