Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cavaness v. General Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 16, 1954No. 14786Published

1DissentDixon, Chief Justice

I agree to the affirmance of- the trial-court’s judgment, but not for -thé reasons given in bur original opinion;

This is a suit instituted by appellant as plaintiff on a written contract.; It is not a suit to cancel the contract for- fraud, accident, or mistake. It is not a suit to reform the contract. Tt is hot a- suit for consequential damages for breach of the-contract. As acknowledged by appellant, it is a suit on the ■contract. ..

In his second amended petition appellant alleged that on January 16, 1946 he individually was the owner of an,invention covering a power mower. He further pled:…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mills v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Heffron v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Abbott v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. ElkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Gray v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API