Cavaness v. General Corporation
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentDixon, Chief Justice
I agree to the affirmance of- the trial-court’s judgment, but not for -thé reasons given in bur original opinion;
This is a suit instituted by appellant as plaintiff on a written contract.; It is not a suit to cancel the contract for- fraud, accident, or mistake. It is not a suit to reform the contract. Tt is hot a- suit for consequential damages for breach of the-contract. As acknowledged by appellant, it is a suit on the ■contract. ..
In his second amended petition appellant alleged that on January 16, 1946 he individually was the owner of an,invention covering a power mower. He further pled:…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mills v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Heffron v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Abbott v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. ElkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Gray v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.