Legal Opinion
Youkelsone v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 8, 2011No. 10-5197PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Plaintiff Nadia Youkelsone carried a mortgage on her New York house. In 2001, Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”) acquired the note and mortgage and then assigned it to Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”). Thereafter, Youkelsone’s home went into foreclosure, WaMu failed, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) became its receiver.
In 2009, Youkelsone brought this action against the FDIC, which, for purposes of this litigation, stands in WaMu’s shoes. Youkelsone alleges that WaMu “owned and/or serviced the mortgage,” Am. Compl.…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wilburn, Nadine C. v. Robinson, KelvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Ord v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ByfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Mobley v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Obaydullah v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Youkelsone v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.