Commonwealth v. Herman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BOWES, J.:
This is a Commonwealth appeal from the trial court's order granting Appellee's motion for habeas corpus relief. Since the trial court declared some provisions of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act ("the Act"), 35 P.S. §§ 780-101 et seq. , unconstitutionally vague, we transfer this appeal to our Supreme Court.
*393 This case concerns a chemical compound designated PB-22. The Commonwealth charged Appellee, Joey Wayne Herman, with, inter alia, possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (PB-22), 1 and possession of a designer drug (PB-22). 2 The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KaretnySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. NoelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Mayfield, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Herman, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Mayfield, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Arnett, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.