Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Karetny

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 15, 2005No. 55 & 56 EAP 2004PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth made out a prima facie case of risking a catastrophe, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3302, as to appellees, who are co-defendants in the underlying criminal prosecution. For the following reasons, we hold that it did, and accordingly, we reverse the Superior Court’s order, vacate the trial court’s order quashing that charge, and remand this matter for trial.

During the years between 1994 and 2000, appellees leased Pier 34 on the Delaware River in the city of Philadelphia, and owned and operated various facilities located on the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Dwayne Harvard v. Christopher CesnalisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. DantzlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. SimsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API