Commonwealth v. Karetny
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth made out a prima facie case of risking a catastrophe, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3302, as to appellees, who are co-defendants in the underlying criminal prosecution. For the following reasons, we hold that it did, and accordingly, we reverse the Superior Court’s order, vacate the trial court’s order quashing that charge, and remand this matter for trial.
During the years between 1994 and 2000, appellees leased Pier 34 on the Delaware River in the city of Philadelphia, and owned and operated various facilities located on the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Dwayne Harvard v. Christopher CesnalisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. DantzlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. SimsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.