Legal Opinion

Pan-American Life Ins. Co. v. Peebles

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1940No. 6 Div. 474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

. SIMPSON, Judge.

This is' an action in assumpsit for money had and received, seeking the recovery of premiums paid on two annuity contracts issued by appellant to appellee’s husband. The pertinent provisions of the contracts are hereinafter quoted. Trial below was before the court, without jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, and judgment was rendered for appellee (plaintiff) in the sum of $698. The sole error here urged is the action of the court in rendering judgment in favor of appellee.

The contract, referred to in the stipulation of facts as Exhibit A, upon its first page contained…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Northam v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zimmerman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API