In re Dombey
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By BELL, PJ.
The Columbus Bar Association, after receipt of two complaints, brought to the knowledge and attention of the judges of this court that Alex S. Dombey, in his office as an attorney at law, probably had been guilty of misconduct or unprofessional conduct involving moral turpitude.
In pursuance to the requirement of the statute (§4705.02 R. C.), the court appointed James M. Hengst, John W. King and William L. Schmidt, three attorneys at law, as a committee to investigate the matter, and if the facts warranted action, to prepare and file written charges against' the accused.
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Disbarment of John D. GreathouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Chreste v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. GoldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. BerezniakIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shimko v. LobeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019