Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Marsh

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1911No. 17,118PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Butler district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This is an action to recover an alleged overpayment made through a mistake in computation. The judgment was for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. ■

The undisputed facts are that the appellee sold to the appellant eighty head of cattle, and received pay*694ment therefor at the rate of $87 per head in two checks, one for $500, given when the agreement was made, and one for $6460, given on the following day when the cattle Were delivered. This dispute is over the price, the appellant contending that the price agreed upon was $78- per head,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. MarbourgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. De Lissa v. Fuller Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Irwin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Giles v. TernesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Talbott v. NibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Davidson v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Readicker v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Darst v. SwazeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API