Griffith v. Marsh
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Butler district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
This is an action to recover an alleged overpayment made through a mistake in computation. The judgment was for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. ■
The undisputed facts are that the appellee sold to the appellant eighty head of cattle, and received pay*694ment therefor at the rate of $87 per head in two checks, one for $500, given when the agreement was made, and one for $6460, given on the following day when the cattle Were delivered. This dispute is over the price, the appellant contending that the price agreed upon was $78- per head,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. MarbourgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- De Lissa v. Fuller Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Irwin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by11 opinions
- Giles v. TernesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Talbott v. NibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Davidson v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Readicker v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Darst v. SwazeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.