Legal Opinion
New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of Adjustment
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 17, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.
In December 1994, New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Company d/b/a Comcast Cellular Communications (“Comcast”) applied to the South Plainfield Board of Adjustment (“Board”) for variances necessary to erect an unmanned cellular communications facility at 313 Durham Avenue, South Plainfield, located in the M-3 zone. The proposed facility was to consist of a four hundred and fifty-six (456) square foot shelter housing radio equipment, and a ninety (90) foot high steel monopole with up to twelve 12" by 54" panel-type antennas.
The Board…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- DeSimone v. Greater Englewood Housing Corp. No. 1Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Urban Farms, Inc. v. Franklin LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Borough of Ho-Ho-KusDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- NY SMSA v. Bd. of Adj. of BernardsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Harrington ParkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.