Legal Opinion
Secord v. Portland Shopping News
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendants contend that the evidence fails to disclose that the plaintiff complied with his contract by producing 280 inches of advertising; that it establishes that the plaintiff was disloyal to his employer, and that it fails to prove that the defendant, “Portland Shopping News,” breached its contract. We have carefully read the testimony and have examined the exhibits. Our conclusions upon these assignments of error are adverse to the defendants.
The contract reserved to the employer a privilege to terminate the contract and pay to the plaintiff the sum of $1,000. We believe that it is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Salem v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Hull v. AngusOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Yuen Suey v. FleshmanOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Alvord v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Medak v. HekimianOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Wright v. Schutt Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Coquille Mill & Tug Co. v. Robert Dollar Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Dean Vincent, Inc. v. McDonoughOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Oregon, State Highway Com'n v. DeLong Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.