Legal Opinion

Olsen Drilling Co. v. Claxton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1931No. 22477PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, C. J.

This is an original proceeding in this court to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of the respondent, W. S. Claxton. Petitioners complain, first, that there was no written notice given by claimant as provided by section 7292, C. O. S. 1921; second, that the notice could have been given'; third, that neither of the petitioners had actual notice of any injury.

The respondent herein filed his first notice with the State Industrial Commission as to his injuries and claim for compensation on April 3, 1931, stating that he received accidental injury on July 20, 1930, while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olson Drilling Co. v. TryonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Kingfisher v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. SevereSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Feenberg Pipe & Supply Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API