Legal Opinion
Polk & Sullivan, Inc. v. United Cities Gas Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1989PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*539OPINION
DROWOTA, Chief Justice.
Polk and Sullivan, Inc. brought this suit against United Cities Gas Company and Marsh & McLennan, Inc., alleging that United Cities Gas had refused to pay premiums and refused to pay a commission owed on insurance coverage obtained by Polk & Sullivan and that Marsh & McLen-nan procured the breach of the contract to pay these premiums and commissions. The Chancellor held (1) that United Cities Gas was required to pay a “pro rata” premium, not a “short rate” premium; (2) that United Cities Gas does not owe Polk & Sullivan a commission for procuring the one policy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hutton v. WattersTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Linda Sue Edwards v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Emmco Insurance Co. v. Beacon Mutual Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Dynamic Motel Management, Inc. v. ErwinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- Continental Motel Brokers, Inc. v. Bill B. Blankenship, Arthur FleckCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Quality Auto Parts Co. v. Bluff City Buick Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Shahrdar v. Global Housing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Watson's Carpet & Floor Coverings, Inc. v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Winfree v. Educators Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.