Legal Opinion

O'NEILL v. Astrue

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 1, 2011No. Civ. 09-3042 (JJK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFFREY J. KEYES, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff Thomas O’Neill seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), who denied Plaintiffs application for disability-insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The parties consented to the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over all proceedings in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 12, 18). For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Robert K. Haley v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 1Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API