People v. Parrow
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Alpena. (Kelley, J.} Respondent was convicted of larceny. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The respondent was convicted in the circuit court for Alpena county of the larceny of $35 in money. The money was taken from a till in the store of Muellerweiss & Co. on May 31, 1889, in the night-time. At the time respondent was arraigned, and before pleading to the information for larceny, his counsel moved to quash the information and discharge the respondent, on the ground that the respondent had been tried and acquitted at the former term of that court of the crime of burglary in breaking and entering the store with intent to commit the crime of larceny of the same money. The information…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
- State v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Triplett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. NuttMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Estevez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Sharp v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Cambron v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.