Mastercraft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Charlotte Flooring, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J:
T1 The only issue presented is whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over a North Carolina corporation who hired an Oklahoma company to perform work in North Carolina. Because of the totality of contacts with the Oklahoma-based corporation, we hold that it did.
*913ALLEGED FACTS
12 Turner Construction, a construction company working on a Harrah's Cherokee Hotel Tower (Casino) in Cherokee, North Carolina, hired the defendant, appellee, Charlotte Flooring, Inc. (CFI) to perform flooring work on the Casino project. CFI is a North Carolina corporation, with its principal place of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- GUFFEY v. OSTONAKULOVSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Montgomery v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- GUFFEY v. OSTONAKULOVSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- MONTGOMERY v. AIRBUS HELICOPTERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- MONTGOMERY v. AIRBUS HELICOPTERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018