Legal Opinion

John Dax Matyastik v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 11, 1994No. 03-93-00221-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

AT AUSTIN

NO. 3-93-221-CR

JOHN DAX MATYASTIK,

APPELLANT

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

NO. 19,242, HONORABLE ROGER HASHEM, JUDGE PRESIDING

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of speeding following a trial in justice of the peace court. Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 6701d, § 166, 169B (West 1977 & Supp. 1994). On appeal by trial de novo in county court, a jury again found appellant guilty and assessed a $150 fine.

Appellant first complains that the county court erred by overruling his motion to quash the complaint. According…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Apolinar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Guzman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  5. Ex Parte JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API