Legal Opinion
Gloria FORD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VALMAC INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1974No. 73-1448PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
We are concerned with the proper venue of an action alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court held that venue lay in Kansas. We allowed an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
Valmac, through a predecessor company, employed plaintiff in its Kansas plant as a chicken cutter until her discharge on September 25, 1968. Operations of the Kansas plant ended on December 31, 1968. In March, 1969, Val-mac opened a plant in Missouri and certain employees of the closed Kansas…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Emmett J. Stebbins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Iinsurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pierce v. Shorty Small's of Branson Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Donnell v. National Guard BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Passantino v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Thompson v. Board of Education of Romeo Community SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1976
- Stith v. Manor Baking Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.