Lee Morgan v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Frank Riciotti, Iii, Real Party in Interest
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Lee Morgan appeals from a decision of an administrative law judge (AU) finding that he engaged in a discriminatory housing practice based on familial status against complainant Frank Riciotti, III, contrary to 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a)-(d). 1 The AU awarded Riciotti $14,297.99 in damages, imposed the maximum civil penalty of $10,000 and enjoined Morgan from discriminating against any persons with respect to housing because of familial status. See 42 U.S.C. § 3612(g)(3). The decision of the AU became final upon the expiration of thirty days without review by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Price v. City of Charlotte, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Elizabeth A. Honce v. Jose A. Vigil, D/B/A Dorado Investments, Inc., A/K/A Villa Chaparral Mobile Home Sub-Division Dorado Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Brad Bangerter v. Orem City Corporation, a Utah Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Pacific Shores Properties, LLC v. City of Newport BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ragin v. Harry Macklowe Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.