Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Kemper

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1976No. 36649, 36658PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

This is a condemnation proceeding initiated by plaintiff to condemn all rights of direct access between Interstate Route 44 and abutting land in the City of Eureka, Missouri. Upon trial of the exceptions of George W. Kropp and Leona W. Kropp, hereafter called defendants, judgment was entered in favor of defendants in the sum of $3,000.00.

Defendants appeal contending that the judgment as to damages in the sum of $3,000.00 is inadequate because it was not within the range of the evidence.

Plaintiff contends that defendants’ property did not abut the highway and that they did not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rude v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Schmittzehe v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Bridle Trail Association v. O'SHANICKMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Zipp v. Gasen's Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Modern Tractor & Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. County of Shannon v. ChiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Citizens Electric Corp. v. AmbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API