Legal Opinion

ALLEY v. MTD PRODUCTS, INC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00003Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA REYNOLDS ALLEY, ) Case No. 3:17-cv-3 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE KIM R. GIBSON ) v. ) ) MTD PRODUCTS, INC., et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Before the Court are Plaintiff Reynolds Alley’s Petition for Delay Damages (ECF No. 122) and Defendants MTD Products, Inc., MTD Consumer Group, Inc., MTD Holdings, Inc., MTD LLC, and MTD Products Ltd’s (collectively, “MTD”) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (ECF No. 125). The motions are fully briefed (ECF Nos. 124, 126, 129, 133, 134) and ripe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schrock v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Arthur v. KucharSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. JodzisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API