Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Kuchar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1996PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*16 OPINION OF THE COURT

NEWMAN, Justice.

Debra Spaeder (Spaeder) and Carol Kuchar (Kuchar) appeal from the February 13, 1995 Order of the Superior Court that vacated and remanded the April 6, 1994 Amended Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County (trial court) awarding delay damages under Pa.R.C.P. 238 to Darlene Arthur (Arthur) in her personal injury action against Spaeder and Kuchar. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the Order of the Superior Court.

FACTS

On May 22, 1987, Arthur, Spaeder and Kuchar were involved in an automobile accident. Arthur filed a complaint against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Krebs v. United Refining Co. of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Riedel v. HUMAN REL. COM'N OF READINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. In re J.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Stephens v. MessickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Knarr v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API