Langley v. Staley Hosiery Mills Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
In response to the third issue the jury awarded the plaintiff permanent damages; and to the proposition that upon the pleadings, the evidence, the record, permanent damages could not be awarded the principal exceptions are addressed. Whether these exceptions should be sustained is the question for decision.
The jury was instructed, in accordance with the rule approved in Brown v. Chemical Co., 162 N. C., 84, that incidental benefits accruing to the party injured cannot be set off against damages' resulting from the alleged nuisance, because such party cannot be required to accept indemnity in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Aldworth v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Parker v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Harper v. Town of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. ComptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clinard v. Town of KernersvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Ivester v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Lightner v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Moses v. Town of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Winchester v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.