Legal Opinion

People v. Hamby

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1921No. Civ. No. 808PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crime of issuing a fictitious check. According to the information the alleged spurious paper was issued over the name O. D. Cook and was made payable to the order of appellant. One Freidman cashed the cheek for appellant and presented it to the bank on which it was drawn, when it was dishonored. The information charges that the paper was forged by appellant, through the. use of the fictitious name 0. D. Cook, with intent to defraud Freidman and the bank.

[1] Appellant first contends for a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. People v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. DillonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API