Legal Opinion
State v. Gargiulo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 3, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
103 N.J. Super. 140 (1968)
246 A.2d 738
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BERNARD WILLIAM GARGIULO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 9, 1968.
Decided October 3, 1968.
Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. James E. Davidson argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Farrell, Curtis, Carlin & Davidson, attorneys; Mr. Edward J. Farrell, on the brief).
Mr. John R. Miller argued the cause for respondent Township of Chatham.
The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.
Defendant appeals from a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of RaritanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Ranney v. Istituto Pontificio Delle Maestre FilippiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Hay v. Bd. of Adjustment of Borough of Ft. LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Burmore Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- State v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Handy Family EnterprisesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- O'DONNELL v. KochNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
- Paruszewski v. Township of ElsinboroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.