Sunny & Suman Gautam, Resps. v. Donald & Jane Doe Hicks, Apps.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
FILcD COURT OF APPEALS OiV 5TAT£ OF WASHINGTON 20I3OCT -7 m 9= U7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SUNNY GAUTAM and SUMAN GAUTAM, husband and wife and their No. 69406-5-1 marital community, DIVISION ONE Respondents, v. DONALD HICKS and JANE DOE PUBLISHED OPINION HICKS, husband and wife and their marital community, FILED: October 7, 2013 Appellants. J Becker, J. — A party who appeals the award in a mandatory arbitration and fails to improve his position on trial de novo must pay the attorney fees incurred by the nonappealing party. An offer of compromise by the nonappealing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cormar, Ltd. v. SauroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Basin Paving Co. v. Contractors Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Basin Paving Co. v. CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004