Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bonfitto v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1961No. Appeal, 14Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Flood, J.:

The court below held, I think correctly, that since res judicata had not been pleaded, the only matter before it was the application of the Statute of Limitations. See Lang v. Recht, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 605, 91 A. 2d 313 (1952). Both counsel acquiesced in this and in their briefs and their oral argument addressed themselves only to the proper determination of the date from which the statute began to run.

The majority opinion has not discussed the question of the Statute of Limitations but has rested this court’s decision upon the law of the case. I respectfully…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. CliftSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Burke v. Pittsburgh Limestone Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Bell, Secy. of Banking v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Girard Trust Co. v. Philadelphia CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API